Careers

Experiences

Industries

Offices

Our Firm

Pages

Our People

Updates

Practices

Home - Warner Norcross + Judd LLP

<p>&lt;p&gt;On Friday, September 25, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court denied leave to appeal in &lt;em&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Order denying Leave&quot; href=&quot;http://coa.courts.mi.gov/documents/SCT/PUBLIC/ORDERS/20090925_S138577_95_138577_2009-09-25_or.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;People v. Aceval&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.  Leave was denied by an equally divided Court with Justices Cavanagh and Markman and Chief Justice Kelly dissenting.  Justice Corrigan recused herself because she has agreed to be a character witness for retired Wayne County Circuit Judge Mary Waterstone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aceval, an Inkster bar owner, was convicted of possession of cocaine.  During his first trial, Judge Waterstone, the former head of the Wayne County prosecutor&#39;s drug unit, and two police officers allegedly permitted perjured testimony to conceal the identity of a confidential informant.  The first trial ended in a mistrial, and Aceval was retried.  During the second trial, Aceval&#39;s counsel uncovered the perjury and the Judge Waterstone recused herself.  The replacement judge disqualified one of Aceval&#39;s attorneys who had appeared for the limited purpose of filing certain pretrial motions.  Aceval eventually entered a guilty plea.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On appeal, Aceval contended that he was denied his right to counsel of his choice and that the use of perjured testimony at his first trial deprived him of due process to the extent that his retrial should have been barred.  The Court of Appeals found the conduct at the first trial to be &quot;disgraceful&quot; and &quot;reprehensible,&quot; but did not conclude that Aceval had been denied the counsel of his choice or that retrial was barred.  The Court of Appeals&#39; decision is &lt;a title=&quot;COA Opinion&quot; href=&quot;http://coa.courts.mi.gov/documents/opinions/final/coa/20090205_c279017_75_22o-279017.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Judge Waterstone, the prosecutor, and the two officers have been charged with felonies for permitting the perjured testimony&lt;em&gt;. &lt;a title=&quot;Detroit News article&quot; href=&quot;http://www.detnews.com/article/20090928/METRO/909280326/1409/METRO/Supreme-Court-judge-could-be-trial-witness&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Detroit News&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/em&gt;is reporting that Justice Corrigan has agreed to be a character witness for Judge Waterstone.&lt;em&gt;  &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</p>

core/freeform

Partner

Matthew T. “Matt” Nelson

MSC Order:  People v. Aceval

Lorem Ipsum

The Warner Norcross + Judd LLP lawyer responsible for the contents of our advertising and this website is managing partner <a href="/people/mark-j-wassink/" aria-label="Mark Wassink">Mark Wassink</a> who can be reached at <a href="mailto:mwassink@wnj.com" aria-label="email Mark Wassink">mwassink@wnj.com</a> or 616.752.2189. Please read our full <a href="/privacy-policy/" aria-label="see privacy policy">privacy policy</a> available on our website.

MSC Order: People v. Aceval

professionals